Organic Transmutation: Assessing the Theory of Elemental Change in Living Microorganisms

Search phrases: Organic transmutation, Louis Kervran, nuclear physics, microbiology, important change, clinical suspicion

Abstract: The concept of biological transmutation, which posits that living microorganisms can convert one chemical element right into one more through nuclear procedures, has been a subject of intrigue and dispute. This post critically examines the beginnings of this hypothesis, primarily credited to French researcher Louis Kervran, and assesses the clinical examinations taken on to validate or refute such insurance claims. Regardless of anecdotal observations suggesting important modifications in biological systems, strenuous scientific examination exposes an absence of empirical evidence sustaining the occurrence of nuclear transmutations in living organisms. The article discusses methodological imperfections in researches promoting for biological transmutation and emphasizes the necessity of sticking to recognized physical laws. The determination of this theory emphasizes the importance of clinical roughness in examining remarkable insurance claims.

Introduction: The principle of biological transmutation recommends that living microorganisms possess the capacity to transform one chemical element right into an additional through procedures comparable to nuclear reactions. This concept tests the foundational concepts of nuclear physics and chemistry, which assert that such changes need problems of extreme energy and are not practical within the light environments of organic systems. The hypothesis obtained prestige via the job of French scientist Louis Kervran in the mid- 20 th century, who suggested that microorganisms could perform elemental transmutations to adjust to nutritional shortages. This post intends to critically examine the credibility of the biological transmutation theory by analyzing its historic context, the clinical examinations carried out, and the current agreement within the scientific community.

Definitions:

• Biological Transmutation: The recommended procedure by which living microorganisms transform one chemical component right into an additional via nuclear responses taking place under typical biological problems. ras.ru
• Nuclear Transmutation: An adjustment in the nucleus of an atom that converts it into a different component, generally requiring high-energy conditions not present in biological systems.
• Isotopes: Variants of a specific chemical element that differ in neutron number, while maintaining the very same number of protons.

Contextual Background: The idea of transmutation has historic roots in alchemy, where specialists looked for methods to transform base metals into honorable ones like gold. In the world of contemporary scientific research, nuclear transmutation is recognized as a procedure happening under high-energy problems, such as in stellar settings or fragment accelerators. The extension of this concept into organic systems arised in the 20 th century, with cases that microorganisms can cause elemental changes to satisfy physiological needs.

Research Questions:

1. What empirical proof exists to support the occurrence of biological transmutation in living organisms?
2. How do the claims of organic transmutation align with well-known concepts of nuclear physics and chemistry?
3. What technical approaches have been utilized to examine organic transmutation, and what are their limitations?

Academic Framework: The theory of biological transmutation stands in comparison to the well-established legislations of preservation of mass and energy, as well as the known requirements for nuclear reactions. According to present clinical understanding, nuclear reactions necessitate problems of exceptionally high temperatures and pressures to conquer the Coulomb barrier– the electrostatic repulsion between positively charged nuclei. These problems are lacking in organic systems, making the occurrence of nuclear transmutations within living organisms highly implausible.

Conversation: Louis Kervran’s monitorings, such as hens purportedly creating calcium-rich eggshells in spite of a calcium-deficient diet regimen, led him to recommend that organisms could transmute aspects like potassium right into calcium. However, subsequent analyses have given alternate descriptions grounded in standard biology and chemistry. For example, it is well-documented that chickens can set in motion calcium from their bone books to generate eggshells when nutritional calcium is insufficient. Moreover, the presence of trace quantities of calcium in feed and water resources, in addition to the body’s efficient nutrient application devices, can make up the observed calcium material without invoking transmutation.

Managed experiments trying to replicate Kervran’s findings have constantly stopped working to offer evidence supporting biological transmutation. Researches using rigorous controls and analytical strategies have actually not spotted adjustments in elemental make-up that would show nuclear transformations. Furthermore, the energy characteristics of nuclear responses are incompatible with the power scales of biochemical procedures, even more challenging the plausibility of such transmutations taking place in living organisms.

Limitations: Examinations right into biological transmutation commonly face obstacles pertaining to the discovery limitations of analytical tools and the control of speculative variables. Trace element evaluation requires highly delicate equipment, and contamination can result in deceptive outcomes. Furthermore, the intricacy of organic systems makes it tough to represent all potential sources and sinks of components, making complex the analysis of data.

Counterarguments and Reactions: Supporters of biological transmutation suggest that unexplained elemental adjustments in organic systems suggest the presence of unknown procedures. Nevertheless, these monitorings can commonly be clarified by traditional biochemical paths, ecological aspects, or technical artifacts. The lack of reproducible proof and academic support undermines the reputation of the organic transmutation hypothesis.

Future Study Directions: Future research study must concentrate on completely exploring the systems of vitamins and mineral assimilation and important homeostasis in microorganisms to elucidate any type of unique processes. Developments in logical strategies may boost our capacity to discover and measure important adjustments with greater accuracy. Nonetheless, any kind of cases of organic transmutation must be subjected to strenuous clinical scrutiny and assessed within the structure of established physical laws.

Theoretical Implications: The rejection of the biological transmutation theory reinforces the toughness of existing nuclear physics and chemistry theories. It highlights the need for amazing evidence when proposing phenomena that test well-established clinical principles. This situation works as a suggestion of the importance of technical rigor and theoretical uniformity in scientific questions.

Verdict: The hypothesis of organic transmutation, while fascinating, lacks empirical assistance and is irregular with well-known scientific understanding. Monitorings recommending important makeovers in living microorganisms can be clarified through traditional biochemical and physiological mechanisms.

References:

• Biberian, J.-P. (2012 Organic Transmutations: Historical Viewpoint. Journal of Condensed Issue Nuclear Science , 7, 11– 25 Fetched from
• Kervran, C. L. (1972 Organic Transmutations (M. Abehsera, Trans.). New York City: Swan Residence Posting Company. (Original work released 1962
• Schwarcz, J. (2014 Is That a Reality?: Frauds, Quacks, and the Genuine Science of Everyday Life Toronto: ECW Press.
• Sheaffer, R. (1998 Uncritical Publicity for Meant ‘Independent UFO Examination’ Demonstrates Media Innocence. Doubtful Inquirer , 22 (5
• Vysotskii, V., & & Kornilova, A. A. (2019 “Biological Transmutation” of Secure and Contaminated Isotopes in Growing Biological Equipments. Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science , 28, 1– 15
• Biberian, J.-P. (2012 Organic transmutations: Historical perspective. Journal of Condensed Issue Nuclear Scientific Research , 7, 11– 25
• Biberian, J.-P. (2019 Biological transmutations. Journal of Condensed Issue Nuclear Science , 28, 21– 27
• Dadachova, E., & & Casadevall, A. (2008 Ionizing radiation: Exactly how fungi cope, adjust, and exploit with the aid of melanin. Current Point Of View in Microbiology , 11 (6, 525– 531
• Kervran, C. L. (1972 Organic transmutations (M. Abehsera, Trans.). Swan House Publishing Firm. (Initial job released 1962
• Schulze-Makuch, D., & & Houtkooper, J. M. (2007 A feasible biogenic origin for hydrogen peroxide on Mars: The Viking outcomes reinterpreted. International Journal of Astrobiology , 6 (3, 307– 310
• Schwarcz, J. (2014 Is that a fact?: Fraudulences, quacks, and the real scientific research of day-to-day life ECW Press.
• Sheaffer, R. (1998 Uncritical promotion for supposed ‘independent UFO examination’ demonstrates media innocence. Cynical Inquirer , 22 (5
• Shunk, G. K., Gomez, X. R., & & Averesch, N. J. H. (2020 A self-replicating radiation-shield for human deep-space expedition: Radiotrophic fungi can undermine ionizing radiation aboard the International Space Station. bioRxiv
• Widom, A., Srivastava, Y. N., & & Sivasubramanian, S. (2011 Biological nuclear transmutations as a source of biophotons. arXiv preprint , arXiv: 1102 4605
• Zhdanova, N. N., Tugay, T., Dighton, J., Zheltonozhsky, V., & & McDermott, P. (2004 Ionizing radiation brings in dirt fungis. Mycological Research , 108 (9, 1089– 1096